DraftKings vs Kalshi 2026

Side-by-side fee comparison, feature checklist, and market coverage

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Fees

Depends on price

Markets

Kalshi

Regulation

Tie

Mobile

Both

Fee Comparison

Per-contract fee at 9 price points. Green = cheaper platform.

PriceDraftKings FeeKalshi FeeCheaper
10¢2.00¢1.00¢Kalshi
20¢2.00¢2.00¢Tie
30¢2.00¢2.00¢Tie
40¢2.00¢2.00¢Tie
50¢2.00¢2.00¢Tie
60¢2.00¢2.00¢Tie
70¢2.00¢2.00¢Tie
80¢2.00¢2.00¢Tie
90¢2.00¢1.00¢Kalshi

DraftKings

$0.02 per contract per side ($0.01 DK + $0.01 CME)

Kalshi

7% × p × (1−p) per contract (taker)

Try your own numbers with the Fee Calculator

Feature Comparison

FeatureDraftKingsKalshi
Open order book
Mobile app
Limit orders
Early exit / sell position
US availability
International availability
CFTC regulated
Bank deposit
Crypto deposit

Market Categories

Both platforms

PoliticsEconomicsSportsFinanceCrypto

Kalshi only

WeatherCulture

CME Contracts vs Native Exchange

DraftKings routes prediction market trades through CME Group event contracts. Kalshi operates its own CFTC-regulated exchange with a native order book. The difference matters: Kalshi gives you direct exchange access with limit orders and visible depth. DraftKings gives you a sportsbook interface wrapped around CME settlement.

Fee Worked Examples

As shown in the fee table above, DraftKings uses a flat fee while Kalshi uses a formula that varies with contract price. Here is the math at three representative price points - verify your specific scenarios with the fee calculator.

At 20¢ (deep value contract): DraftKings charges $0.02 per side, $0.04 round-trip. Kalshi charges ceil(0.07 × 0.20 × 0.80 × 100)/100 = $0.02 per side, $0.04 round-trip. At this price point, the fees are identical. But Kalshi also offers reduced maker fees (approximately 25% of the taker rate), so if you post a limit order instead of crossing the spread, your Kalshi round-trip drops meaningfully below $0.04. DraftKings does not have maker/taker differentiation.

At 50¢ (coin-flip contract): DraftKings: $0.02 per side, $0.04 round-trip. Kalshi: ceil(0.07 × 0.50 × 0.50 × 100)/100 = $0.02 per side, $0.04 round-trip. Again identical at the taker rate. But with Kalshi's maker discount, a limit order strategy reduces the effective round-trip. At 50¢ contracts - the most common trading range - this maker fee advantage is Kalshi's real edge over DraftKings for patient traders.

At 80¢ (high-probability contract): DraftKings: $0.02 per side, $0.04 round-trip. Kalshi: ceil(0.07 × 0.80 × 0.20 × 100)/100 = $0.02 per side, $0.04 round-trip. Same taker rate. On high-probability contracts where your expected profit is only $0.20 per winning contract, the $0.04 round-trip fee consumes 20% of gross profit on both platforms. The maker discount on Kalshi becomes especially valuable here - reducing fees from $0.04 to roughly $0.03 round-trip changes a marginal trade into a profitable one.

At extreme prices (10¢ or 90¢): DraftKings: still $0.04 round-trip. Kalshi: ceil(0.07 × 0.10 × 0.90 × 100)/100 = $0.01 per side, $0.02 round-trip. Here Kalshi is half the cost. For traders who specialize in deep out-of-the-money contracts or near-certainty hedges, this gap is substantial.

Market Coverage Comparison

DraftKings and Kalshi cover partially overlapping but distinct market categories.

Both offer: political markets (presidential, congressional, gubernatorial), some economic indicator contracts, and high-profile cultural events. Where the same underlying event is tradable on both, pricing may differ because DraftKings routes through CME and Kalshi uses its own order book - different liquidity pools produce different prices.

Kalshi exclusives: weather markets (hurricane landfalls, temperature records, snowfall totals), a broader catalog of economic indicators, and niche event contracts that Kalshi lists through its own CFTC approval process. Kalshi also adds new markets faster for events in its approved categories.

DraftKings advantages: availability to its massive sportsbook user base across 38 states, and the ability to trade prediction markets alongside sports bets in a single app. For users who already have funded DraftKings accounts, the zero-friction onboarding is a genuine convenience benefit.

Execution Quality

This is where the comparison gets lopsided. Kalshi offers a full central limit order book: limit orders, market orders, bracket orders, and full depth-of-book visibility. You can see every bid and ask at every price level, estimate slippage before committing capital, and post passive orders to capture the spread.

DraftKings presents take-it-or-leave-it pricing. No order book, no limit orders, no visible depth. You see a price and you buy or you do not. There is no ability to place a bid between the current spread and wait for a fill. For a 10-contract trade, this is irrelevant. For a 500-contract position, the inability to work an order means you accept whatever price DraftKings displays, which may include meaningful slippage relative to the true CME mid-price.

Kalshi also provides API access for programmatic trading. If you build automated strategies, need real-time data feeds, or want to run backtests against historical order book data, Kalshi supports this. DraftKings does not offer API access for prediction markets - all trading is manual through the app.

Tax and Regulatory Differences

Both DraftKings and Kalshi operate within US regulatory frameworks, but the structures differ. Kalshi is a CFTC-regulated Designated Contract Market - its own exchange. DraftKings is a state-licensed sportsbook operator routing through CME Group (also CFTC-regulated). Both generate tax reporting and issue 1099 forms.

Gains on Kalshi contracts are treated as Section 1256 contracts - 60% long-term, 40% short-term capital gains regardless of holding period. This is a meaningful advantage for active traders in higher tax brackets. DraftKings' prediction market gains should receive the same treatment since they settle through CME, but verify how DraftKings reports these on your 1099 - if they are lumped with sports betting winnings, the tax treatment could differ.

Neither platform involves cryptocurrency, so there are no on-ramp/off-ramp taxable events. Both accept USD deposits through standard banking.

When Each Platform Makes Sense

DraftKings makes sense if: you are a casual bettor already using DraftKings for sports, you want a familiar interface, and you make a small number of trades per month where the fee difference is negligible in absolute dollars. If you place 10 trades per month, the maximum fee savings from switching to Kalshi is about $0.10/month - not worth a new account.

Kalshi makes sense if: you trade actively (20+ round-trips per month), you want an open order book with limit orders, you trade contracts at extreme prices where the fee gap is widest, or you want API access for systematic strategies. The maker fee discount alone can save $0.01 per round-trip, which at 100 trades/month is $1.00 - small, but it compounds.

If you are in a state where Kalshi is not available but DraftKings is, DraftKings wins by default. Check availability for both platforms in your state before comparing features.

For anyone doing more than a handful of trades per week, Kalshi's lower fees, richer trading infrastructure, and maker discount make it the quantitatively superior choice. Use the EV calculator to model the exact impact on your specific trading pattern.